The Race to Torpedo Their Candidate
Posted in Campain news, Our government as a whole on August 12th, 2008
As of late I have not been able to stop reading the newspaper or listen to the news. As a card carrying Independent, I have been busy constantly reminding myself to view the upcoming presidential election with unbiased analysis of the Fine senators vying for the job. With that being said I can’t help but to comment on the apparent race to see which party will torpedo their candidate first. For those of you keeping score at home it is 2-1, Democrats. The Democrats took the lead with a go ahead goal, when it was revealed that former Clinton campaign strategist Mark Penn made some less than scrupulous suggestions regarding Sen. Obama and America.
Two sounds were heard in homes across America. The first was the audible gasp from those Liberal-Democrats who hold their favorite politicians in an almost God like reverence (perfect, and can do no wrong). The second was the equally loud roars of laughter from the conservative right over the discovery of the Democrats very own “Karl Rove”. To be honest it does not surprise me, as most Independents, I subscribe to the “for every ying there must be a yang” theory. But if one looks at the article and really sees the underlying meaning then obvious questions concerning the decision making of Hillary Clinton come to light. And considering that at the very least she will end up in a prominent cabinet position, it is only fair that we consider this as it pertains to the numerous names that will be thrown about in the following months.
So let us look at what we already have as prior facts concerning Mark Penn. We know he is presumptuous (he is a strategist folks that’s what they do presume to know what is on the publics mind and then act). We also know he is boastful (on more than one occasion has hinted Hillary would have won with him). Most importantly though, this was not his first rodeo! He had a resume’ apparently an impressive one. For it landed him a job as the strategist of someone in the position of possibly becoming the president. So why did someone not discover that what was being preached on cable political shows was not what Mr. Penn represented?
Another question should be does Hillary share his obvious philosophy of win at all cost? On one hand he was let go, but on the other, it was not over this memo. I guess an argument could be made that in this case she lost, so no harm no foul and if this were an isolated incident then it could be made. But it is not an isolated incident, this revelation is but the latest in what is turning out to be a bad week to be a Democrat. With this along with the John Edwards soap opera it would be enough to force average democrats on the local levels to ask “who is watching the store”. We have seen over the past six years that faith of party has been on a decline among average Republicans, but they have not shaken their base much if any.
I do agree with a couple of things that the article reports on the first being the importance in swaying the undecided and Independents. And I do believe his is going to strain an already strained relationship between the two camps even more. Republicans drew first blood with the Stevens indictments. John Edwards tied the score at one all and now the Democrats have pulled ahead with this. Yep! I wonder who will win the race to torpedo their candidate. The ball is in your court Republicans
To read the complete article :http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/08/12/atlantic.clinton.staff/index.html